<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Emerging patterns</title>
	<atom:link href="http://csabaveres.net/blog8/index.php/2006/02/07/emerging-patterns/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://csabaveres.net/blog8/2006/02/07/emerging-patterns/</link>
	<description>"Whenever people agree with me I always feel I must be wrong."  Oscar Wilde</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 13:00:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Csaba</title>
		<link>http://csabaveres.net/blog8/2006/02/07/emerging-patterns/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Csaba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 15:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://csabaveres.net/blog8/?p=7#comment-3</guid>
		<description>I am hoping it does fit the definition! O.K. here is what I said:
&quot;My map has the following numbers next to it: (78, 168, 56), meaning that I have 78 unique URLs tagged with a total of 168 tags, but only 56 of those are unique.&quot;
So by unique I mean they don&#039;t always appear with some other tag (which is I think what you also mean).

So I conclude that there is &quot;a selected set of tags which in some sense dominates the others&quot;. The sense(s) or the semantics of the dominance relation is not entirely clear as far as I can see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am hoping it does fit the definition! O.K. here is what I said:<br />
&#8220;My map has the following numbers next to it: (78, 168, 56), meaning that I have 78 unique URLs tagged with a total of 168 tags, but only 56 of those are unique.&#8221;<br />
So by unique I mean they don&#8217;t always appear with some other tag (which is I think what you also mean).</p>
<p>So I conclude that there is &#8220;a selected set of tags which in some sense dominates the others&#8221;. The sense(s) or the semantics of the dominance relation is not entirely clear as far as I can see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pietro Speroni di Fenizio</title>
		<link>http://csabaveres.net/blog8/2006/02/07/emerging-patterns/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Pietro Speroni di Fenizio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 16:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://csabaveres.net/blog8/?p=7#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Interesting analysis. The third number in the map represents the number of &#039;Main Tags&#039;. Now a main tag is a tag that is not contained properly as a sub tag of any other tag. I am not sure if your description fits this definition.

And indeed yes, there are many different strategies that people follow in tagging.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting analysis. The third number in the map represents the number of &#8216;Main Tags&#8217;. Now a main tag is a tag that is not contained properly as a sub tag of any other tag. I am not sure if your description fits this definition.</p>
<p>And indeed yes, there are many different strategies that people follow in tagging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.317 seconds -->
